This article is
here only because others like you -- unionists who understand the importance
of democracy in our unions and our countries -- contribute to AUD.
From the March 2007 issue
of $100 Plus Club News #105
UA (Plumbers & Pipefitters) Local 375 Breakthrough
in Protecting Member Rights: Hiring Hall Rule Provides For Member Recourse
(updated 5/17/07)
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 375 in Alaska has added an unusual provision
to its hiring hall rules. Section 3 provides formal recourse for members
who feel that they have been unfairly treated in job referrals. Complaints
are first filed with the business manager, who must rule within 30 days.
If dissatisfied, the complainant is entitled to a hearing before the union's
Hiring Committee, which must rule in writing on the appeal and post a
copy in the hiring hall. Complainants who are still dissatisfied can then
demand a final decision before an impartial arbitrator under the rules
of the American Arbitration Association.
All construction workers, take notice! This
is something you may want to consider for your local.
There are questions. Who, for example, pays the costs
of arbitration? How are rank and file workers to know which arbitrators
are most likely to be really impartial and fair in a dispute between a
mere individual and an established officialdom? These are aspects to be
worked out. Still, these procedures are innovative. For the construction
trades, they are not only unique, they are remarkable.
For one thing, by addressing the issue, Local 375
acknowledges that there is or can be a problem that should be dealt with.
This is a far cry from the familiar reaction in those construction unions
which not only deny discrimination in their hiring halls, but which resist
tenaciously every effort by victims to seek justice. Also, the Local 375
rule does more than offer empty homilies; it prescribes specific procedures
and time limits for resisting unfair practices. Above all, however, by
accepting AAA-type arbitration as the final solution, it recognizes that
justice in hiring disputes requires that complainants must have final
recourse outside the union's own power structure to an impartial agency.
Section three of Article IV "Responsibilities
of Hiring Committee and Hiring Agent" of Local 375 of the Plumbers
& Pipefitters, is reproduced below in its entirety. Thanks to AUD
friend, attorney William Schendel for bringing this to our attention.
"... Sec. 3. Complaints about the Hiring Hall;
Appeal; Arbitration.
Any applicant or registrant of the Hiring Hall who
believes that he or she has been the subject of a violation of the Hiring
Hall Rules shall promptly report the facts by contacting the Business
Manager no later than ten (10) calendar days after the date of the alleged
violation, or after the date of discovery of the alleged violation,
whichever is later. If the aggrieved person is not satisfied with the
Business Manager's informal resolution of the matter, or if the Business
Manager fails to respond, the aggrieved person shall file a written
complaint with the business manager no later than twenty (20) calendar
days after the date of the alleged violation or after the date of discovery
of the alleged violation, whichever is later. The complaint must be
in writing; must be signed by the aggrieved person; must state the nature
of the complaint and must identify the conduct alleged to be offensive;
and must state the relief or remedy that would cure the complaint. The
Business Manager shall promptly investigate and take all necessary remedial
action. The Business Manager shall reduce his or her decision to writing
within 30 calendar days, and shall deliver a copy of said decision to
the complaining party.
If the complaining person is dissatisfied with the
decision of the Business Manager, he or she may ask the Hiring Committee
for a hearing to review the matter by delivering a written notice of
appeal to the Business Manager no later than fifteen (15) calendar days
after receipt of the decision by the appealing party.
Hearing procedures shall be informal and subject
to such uniform rules of procedure as the Hiring Committee may adopt.
The decision of the Hiring Committee shall be in writing and shall be
delivered to all persons entitled thereto and posted at the Hiring Hall
for the period of not less than thirty (30) days.
If the complaining party is dissatisfied with the
decision of the Hiring Committee, he or she shall obtain review of the
matter through impartial arbitration by delivering a written request
for arbitration to the Business Manager no later than fifteen (15) calendar
days after the receipt of the decision by the complaining party. Arbitration
shall be governed by the Alaska Arbitration Act and the rules of the
American Arbitration Association.
No action will be taken against any person who opposes
or reports any unlawful conduct."
Questions or comments, are more than welcome. Please call
AUD at 718-564-1114 or email info@uniondemocracy.org. We'll print letters
or emails (with your permission) in the next issue of Union Democracy
Review.
This website
is made possible by contributions from union members and supporters like
you. Please help us build the movement for union democracy, join
or contribute to AUD.
Use
the following credit line on the materials you use: "From the
website of the Association for Union Democracy. www.uniondemocracy.org. Email:
info@uniondemocracy.org. 104 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11225; USA;
718-564-1114"